General Definition: The substantive aspects of an argument; the “Warrants”. This is distinct from the stylistic delivery of a speech. Public Forum: In PF, judges vary on how they weigh substantive versus stylistic aspects of the debate, although they should focus on argument quality and engagement, with weak arguments penalized and …
General Definition: A full argument, including a statement of the central claim or premise, analysis of the status quo, mechanisms or links defining how the motion changes the status quo, and impacts. A debate case may be organized into multiple contentions (e.g. “Contention One”, “Contention Two”, etc.). Public Forum: see …
General Definition: A method of weighing two positions by comparing the disadvantages with the advantages; in other words, does the proposal do more harm or good? This is one of the most common ways to decide a debate round. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate: see general definition. …
General Definition: A three-minute questioning period after the first and second speeches where opponents take turns asking each other questions. Traditionally, the person that spoke first may ask the first question. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate:Not used in WSD, where “Points of Information” are offered instead. British …
General Definition: A method of clarifying the debate into key areas and highlighting why the judge should vote a specific way. Public Forum: Commonly used. In PF, summary speeches should begin crystallizing the debate, with a majority happening in the final focus. . World Schools Debate: Commonly used. In WSD, reply speeches …
General Definition: Arguments decreasing the impact of an opponent’s argument, prevent them from scoring points or adding weight to their side. Also known as “Mitigation“, defense is often framed as reasons the judge shouldn’t vote for an opponent. Defensive arguments are generally weaker than “Offensive Arguments”, although they can play …
General Definition: The negative effects of an action or idea; used to weigh the conclusions of an argument. Could also refer to a formal argument known as a disadvantage (or “DA”). Public Forum: In PF, disadvantages (or “DAs”) can serve as independent arguments against a position that consist of three parts: …
General Definition: A logical contradiction that occurs when a speaker turns both the link and impact in response to the same argument. For example, if team one argues that their side prevents something bad from occurring, and team two responds that no, team one actually causes (link turn) a good …
General Definition: In general, anything that can be observed. In a debate, empirical analysis supports an argument by providing historical analysis of why the position is true. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate: see general definition. British Parliamentary: see general definition. Canadian National Debate Format: see general definition.
General Definition: Appeals to credibility; rhetoric designed to persuade an audience by enhancing the credibility or ethical appeal of the speaker. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate: see general definition. British Parliamentary: see general definition. Canadian National Debate Format: see general definition.
General Definition: In debate, a supporting argument for why a claim is true, including examples, logic, studies, data, or expert opinion. Evidence may also refer to research in prepped debates. See also “Justification” and “Warrant“. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate: In WSD, research is not prioritized as much …
General Definition: Repeating an argument or evidence from a previous speech in order to provide additional context, analysis, or weighing. In BP, a new argument presented by the member speech that provides a unique perspective from the front half. Public Forum: see general definition. World Schools Debate: In WSD, extension is …