Framework

  • Date 2022-07-18

General Definition: A “lens” by which the judge should view the round or priorize certain impacts over others. Typically, debaters default to a simple “Cost-Benefit Analysis” that compares the advantages and disadvantages of a position, but a more strategic framework will prioritize impacts that are easier for one side of the debate to achieve than the other.

  • Public Forum: see general definition.
  • World Schools Debate: In WSD, framework is about defining the scope of the motion for the judge and competitors. Framework is done by the Proposition team. Proposition should provide definitions for the motion and a model, if necessary. See also “Modelling“.
  • British Parliamentary: In BP, framework is about defining the scope and context of the debate for the judge and competitors. As well, framing is done by both sides and all teams in order to obtain a strategic advantage. For example, teams will often frame the round by emphasizing different elements of the status quo, such as an ongoing war, upcoming election, or broader historical trends. 
  • Canadian National Debate Format: In CNDF, framework is about defining the scope of the motion for the judge and competitors. Framework is done by the Proposition team. Proposition should provide definitions for the motion and a model, if necessary. See also “Modelling“.