We value your privacy

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyse our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.

Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Speaker Points

  • Date 2022-07-25

General Definition: A score given to debaters that assesses their style, delivery, and organization for a particular debate. See also “Ballot”.

  • Public Forum: Commonly used. In PF, speaker points typically range from 25 to 30, with 27.5 representing an average speech, 25 representing a failure to engage with the debate or rudeness, and a 30 representing the ideal “perfect” speech, in the judge’s opinion.
  • World Schools Debate: Not a common phrase in WSD. Instead of speaker points, a judge’s ballot is divided into three categories: content, style, and strategy and each speech is given a score using these three areas. Constructives, rebuttals, and summaries can receive a score between 60 and 80 points, while replies can receive between 30 and 40 points. All speakers scores on a each team are added together and the team with the most points is declared the winner. A judge’s ballot will also typically include written feedback to debaters. See also “Content”, “Style”, and “Strategy”.
  • British Parliamentary: Commonly used. In BP, judges confer with each other and arrive at a consensus or split descision on team rankings from 1st to 4th place. The chair determines speaker scores with possible consultation from their panelists. The effective speaker score range is from 65-90, with 75 being the average speech expected at that particular tournament. Scores below 65 are reserved for equity violations and should be justified to the OrgCom; likewise scores above 85 are reserved for exceptional speeches and also should be justified to the OrgCom.
  • Canadian National Debate Format: Commonly used. In CNDF, speaker points are divided into five categories: Organization/Structure, Evidence/Analysis, Rebuttal/ Clash, Delivery/Etiquette, and Questioning/Responding. The effective speaker score range is from 75-95, with 83-87 being average. Scores below 75 are rare and reserved for exceptional poor speeches due to unfamiliarity with the style, little to no speech content, or deliberate equity violations, and require permission from the OrgCom; likewise scores above 95 are virtually never given, reserved for a speech that was “perfect and the best in Canada”, and require permission from the OrgCom.